American Journal of Educational Science
Articles Information
American Journal of Educational Science, Vol.1, No.2, May 2015, Pub. Date: May 18, 2015
Relationship Between JOB Performance, JOB Involvement and Career Salience of Employees in Education Sector of Pakistan
Pages: 19-23 Views: 3209 Downloads: 3080
[01] Rizwan Qaiser Danish, Hailey College of Commerce, University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
[02] Ahmad Usman Shahid, Hailey College of Commerce, University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
[03] Nauman Aslam, Hailey College of Commerce, University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
[04] Mariam Afzal, Institute of Business & Finance, National University of Modern Language, Lahore, Pakistan.
[05] Hafiz Yasir Ali, Hailey College of Commerce, University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the behaviour of the employees and organizational performance on employee’s job involvement and career salience through proper coordination and comfortable ecological situation in work place. Questionnaires were personally administered for data collection purposes using random sampling technique, 235 questionnaires were distributed and 205 were completely filled producing the response rate of 91%. We use statistical techniques through SPSS and the statistical tools which used in research are reliability and correlation analysis and then testing of hypotheses. The hypothetical sense of career salience is not satisfactory. The nature of data is primary and has been collected from capital of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. The results reflect that there is a significant direct and positive relationship between independent variables and dependent variable.
Job Involvement, Career Salience, Organizational Performance
[01] Betz, N. E., and Fitzgerald, L. F. (1987). The career psychology of women. New York: Academic.
[02] Brown, S.P., 1996. A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 235–255.
[03] Gordon, M. E., & Fitzgibbons, W. J. (1982). Empirical test of the validity of seniority as a factor in staffing decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 311–319.
[04] Greenhaus, J.H. (1971). An investigation of the role of career salience in vocational behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1, 209-216.
[05] Hunt, S. T. (1996). Generic work behavior: An investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance. Personnel Psychology, 49, 51–83.
[06] Jacobs, R., Hofmann, D. A., & Kriska, S. D. (1990). Performance and seniority. Human Performance, 3, 107–121.
[07] Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1039–1050.
[08] Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty members' morale and their intention to leave: A multilevel explanation. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518-542.
[09] Kiyani, A., Haroon, M., Khattak, M.A., Bukhari, S.J. and Asad, R. (2011). Impact of career salience on university teachers’ job involvement: A study on public and private universities in Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 55, 1795-1803.
[10] Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 934–945.
[11] Masih, L. K. (1967). Career saliency and its relation to certain needs, interests, and job values. Personnel and guidance Journal, 45, 653-658.
[12] Medoff, J. L., & Abraham, K. G. (1980). Experience, performance, and earnings. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, 703–736.
[13] Medoff, J. L., & Abraham, K. G. (1981). Are those paid more really more productive? The case of experience. Journal of Human Resources, 16, 186–216.
[14] Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 257–279.
[15] Organ, D. W. (1988). A restatement of the satisfaction–performance hypothesis. Journal of Management, 14, 547–557.
[16] Paullay, I., Alliger, G., and Stone -Romero, E. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 224-8.
[17] Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80.
[18] Savickas IM (2001). A developmental perspective on vocational behavior: career patterns, salience, and themes. International Journal of Educational and Vocational Guideline, 1(1-2): pp.49-57.
[19] Sonmezer, M. G., & Eryaman, M. Y. (2008). A comparative analysis of job satisfaction levels of public and private school teachers. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4(2), 189-212.
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.