International Journal of Plant Science and Ecology
Articles Information
International Journal of Plant Science and Ecology, Vol.1, No.4, Aug. 2015, Pub. Date: May 26, 2015
Apple Breeding in Tunisia and the Actual Climatic Context: Quality Assessment and Crop Adaptation
Pages: 131-137 Views: 3610 Downloads: 985
[01] Mehdi Trad, Laboratory of Horticulture, National Institute for Agricultural Research, Inrat, Tunisia.
[02] Badii Gaaliche, Laboratory of Horticulture, National Institute for Agricultural Research, Inrat, Tunisia.
[03] Rym Bouhlal, Laboratory of Horticulture, National Institute for Agricultural Research, Inrat, Tunisia.
[04] Mounira Harbi, Laboratory of Horticulture, National Institute for Agricultural Research, Inrat, Tunisia.
[05] Hmida Ben Hamda, Laboratory of Horticulture, National Institute for Agricultural Research, Inrat, Tunisia.
[06] Salem Laouini, Laboratory of Horticulture, National Institute for Agricultural Research, Inrat, Tunisia.
An apple breeding program has recently led to thirteen new apple accessions (H1 to H13) growing at the INRAT experimental station in north-east Tunisia. Assessment of Quality performances on the basis of morpho-chemical traitsshowed a large diversity between apple genotypes. Fruit size and yield were obviously different. Average fruit weight varied between 73 g (H1 samples) and 183 g (H9 fruits). A large diversity was observed in fruit shape and colour, the fruit can be globose conical (H1, H4, H6 and H12), flat (H8, H9, H10 and H11), oblate (H3, H7 and H13) or conical (H5). Ground colour of the skin varied from yellow green (H1 and H3), red green (H9, H10 and H13), yellow (H5 and H6) to red (H2, H8 and H12) and chromaticity values were strong related to external fruit colour. Fruit firmness ranged between 0.496 and 0.644 kg/cm2. Total soluble solids (TSS) ranged between 13.2% and 16.5% and titratable acidity (TA) of the juice between 0.005 and 0.011 g malic acid/L. The index of maturity (IM = TSS/TA) was the highest for H2 while H7 apples exhibited the lowest IM score. Juice yield, an important criterion in postharvest technology, varied from 27% in H7 apples to 44% in H12 fruits. The results give a preliminary classification of the 13 new apple accessions using quality rating of the fruit. The range of apple strains H2, H8, H9 and H13 presented the most attractive fruit considering physical aspects, while H2, H3, H7 and H10remain interesting on the basis of flavour and quality taste of the fruit which could be somewhat explained by the advancedstage of maturity reached by these fruits at the harvest time.
Malus Domestica, Quality Rating, Fruit Shape, Skin Colour, Maturity Index, Principal Component Analysis, Hierarchical Cluster Analysis
[01] Anonymous.1981. Les variétésfruitièresrecommandées en Tunisie. Document Technique de l’INRAT, N°83.
[02] Ayala-Silva, T., R. J. Schnell, R. W. Meerow, M. Winterstein, C. Cervantes and J. S. Brown.2005. Determination of color and fruit traits of half-sib families of mango (Mangiferaindica L.). Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 118: 253-257.
[03] Blankenship, S.M., M. Parker, and C. R. Unrath. 1997. Use of maturity indices for predicting post-storage firmness of Fuji apples. HortScience 32(5): 909-910.
[04] Blazek, J. and F.Paprstein. 2014. Development of fruit quality within top apple cultivars based on the consumer preference testing in last 34 years. Horticultural Science (Prague) 41(1): 10-18.
[05] Choi, K., G. Lee,Y. J. Han, and J. M. Bun. 1995. Tomato maturity evaluation using colour image analysis. Trans. ASABE 38(1): 171–176.
[06] Dayton, F.D. 1963. Distribution of red colour in the skin of apple cultivars of McIntosh parentage. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 82: 51-55.
[07] Eccher, T. 1986. Russeting and shape of Golden Delicious apples as related to endogenous GA content of fruitlets. Acta Hort. 179: 767-770.
[08] Eigenmann, C. and M. Kellerhals. 2007. WelcheApfelwollendieKonsumentinnen und Konsumenten? Agrarforschung 14: 6–9.
[09] Harbi Ben Slimane, M., H. SnoussiTrifa, F. Askri,N. Ben Abdelaali, H. Ben Mohamed, R. Bouhlal, A. ChelliChaabouni, N.Elloumi,E.Jedidi, A. Lachkar and S. MsalmiTaoueb.2013. Ressourcesarboricoles en Tunisie: potentialitésetacquis. Annalesdel’INRAT 86: 149-167.
[10] Harker, R. 2001. Consumer response to apples. Washington Tree Fruit Postharvest Conference. WSU-TFREC Postharvest Information Network. Wenatchee, WA, USA.
[11] IBPGR. 1982. Descriptor list for Apple (Malus). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy. 49 p.
[12] Iglesias, I. and S. Alegre. 2006. The effect of anti-hail nets on fruit protection, radiation, temperature, quality and profitability of ‘Mondial Gala’ apples. J. Appl. Hort. 8(2): 91-100.
[13] Iglesias, I., G. Echeverria. andY. Soria. 2008. Differences in fruit colour development, anthocyanin content, fruit quality and consumer acceptability of eight ‘Gala’ apple strains. ScientiaHortic. 119: 32-40.
[14] Kader, A.A. 1992. An overview. In: A.A. Kader (ed.), Post-harvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication, pp. 15-20.
[15] Karaçali, I. 2002. Storage and marketing of horticultural products. Ege University, Agric. Fac., Turkey, Publication N° 494.
[16] Luchsinger, L.E. and C. S. Walsh. 1993. Changes in ethylene rate and ground colour in peaches (cv. Red Haven and Marqueen) and nectarines (cv. Fantasia) during maturation and ripening. Acta Hort. 343: 70-72.
[17] Sansavini, S., F. Donati, F. Costa, and S. Tartarini. 2004. Advances in apple breeding for enhanced fruit quality and resistance to biotic stresses: new varieties for the European market. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 12: 13-52.
[18] Singh, K.K. and B. S. Reddy. 2006. Post-harvest physico-mechanical properties of orange peel and fruit. J. Food Eng. 73: 112-120.
[19] Stoeckli, S., K. Mody, S. Dorn, and M. Kellerhals. 2011. As¬sociation between herbivore resistance and fruit quality in apple. HortScience 46: 12-15.
[20] Trad, M., B. Gaaliche, R., Bouhlal, H. Ben Hamda, M. Harbi, and S. Laouini. 2014. Assessment of quality performance of 13 new apple accessions growing in mild areas of Tunisia. 13th International days of Biotechnology. December 2014, Hammamet, Tunisia.
[21] Trad, M., B. Gaaliche, C. M. G. C.Renard, and M. Mars. 2012. Quality Performance of ‘Smyrna’ Type Figs Grown under Mediterranean conditions of Tunisia. J. Ornam. Hort. Plants 2(3): 139-146.
[22] UPOV. 2005. Apple (Fruit varieties), UPOV Code: MALUS_DOM (MalusdomesticaBorkh.). International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva, 45 p.
[23] Watada, A.E., J. A. Abbott, and R. E. Hardenburg.1980. Sen¬sory characteristics of apple fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105: 371–375.
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.