Journal of Language, Linguistics and Literature
Articles Information
Journal of Language, Linguistics and Literature, Vol.4, No.2, Jun. 2018, Pub. Date: Jun. 6, 2018
The Influence of Semantic Relationship on Semantic Priming Effect
Pages: 19-28 Views: 353 Downloads: 139
Authors
[01] Tao Zeng, College of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
[02] Xiaoya Li, College of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
[03] Biyun Deng, College of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
[04] Taoyan Zhu, College of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
[05] Rui Zhu, College of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
Abstract
Factors that influence semantic priming effects have captured the attention of many scholars. Previous studies on factors influencing semantic priming effects have made great progress, but there are still some inadequacies. Although it is commonly agreed that semantic priming occurs in semantic-related word pairs, the influence of different lexical semantic relationship types has rarely been investigated. The present study tried to investigate the difference of semantic priming effect between Chinese learners’ native and second language, as well as the influence of lexical relationships on semantic priming. Two experiments were carried out by adopting a lexical decision task. Results showed that: 1) The magnitude of semantic priming was not consistent between the native language and the second language by the variables of error rate and reaction time. 2) Generally, synonyms and antonyms have a significant influence on semantic priming effect in the two languages, but there was no significant difference between the two types of relationship. Hyponym exerted different influence on semantic priming effect between native and second languages. In the native language, the hyponym pairs had the largest impact on semantic priming, while in the second language, the semantic relationship of hyponym did not have any impact on semantic priming.
Keywords
Semantic Relatedness, Semantic Type, Semantic Priming Effects
References
[01] Ansarin, A. A. & Manesh, S. S. 2015. Reaction Time in Semantic Priming Experiments with Persian (L1) vs English (L2) Primes [J]. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 19: 121-132.
[02] Agnieszka, E. T. & Gabriella, R. 2017. Cross-linguistic semantic transfer in bilingual Chinese-English speakers [J]. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27 (3): 697-711.
[03] Anderson, J. R. 1983a. The architecture of cognition [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[04] Balota, D. A. 1990. The role of meaning in word recognition [J]. Comprehension Processes in Reading: 9-32.
[05] Becker, S., Moscovitch, M., Behrmann, M. & Joordens, S. 1997. Long-term semantic priming: a computational account and empirical evidence [J]. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 23: 1059-1082.
[06] Collins, A. M. & Lofus, E. F. 1975. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing [J]. Psychological Review 82: 407-428.
[07] Frenck-Mestre, C. & Prince, P. 1997. Second Language Autonomy [J]. Journal of Memory & Language 37 (4): 481-501.
[08] Frenckmestre, C. & Pynte, J. 1997. Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages [J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 50 (1): 119-148.
[09] Gillund, G. & Shiffrin, R. 1984. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall [J]. Psychological Review 19: 1-65.
[10] Grainger, J. & Frenck-Mestre, C. 1998. Masked priming by translation equivalents in proficient bilinguals [J]. Language and Cognitive Process 13 (6): 601–623.
[11] Grainger, J. & Segui, J. 1990. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies [J]. Perception and Psychophysics 47: 191-198.
[12] Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C. & Abrams, R. L. 1996. Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation [J]. Science 273 (5282): 1699–1702.
[13] Hodgson, J. M. 1991. Informational constraints on pre-lexical priming [J]. Language & Cognitive Processes 6: 169-205.
[14] Hutchison, K. A. 2003. Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A micro-analytic review [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 (4): 785-813.
[15] Klauer, K. C., Eder, A. B., Greenwald, A. G. & Abrams, R. L. 2007. Priming of semantic classifications by novel subliminal prime words [J]. Consciousness and Cognition 16: 63–83.
[16] Lucas, M. 2000. Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 (4): 618-630.
[17] Lupker, S. J. 1984. Semantic priming without association: A second look [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23: 709–733.
[18] Masson, M. E. J. 1995. A distributed memory model of semantic priming [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21 (1): 3-23.
[19] McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. 1992. Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: Mediated priming revisited [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 18: 1155–1172.
[20] McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. 1995. Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2: 527–533.
[21] McNamara, T. P. 1992a. Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval [J]. Psychological Review 99: 650–662.
[22] McNamara, T. P. 1992b. Theories of priming: I. Associative distance and lag [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 18 (6): 1173–1190.
[23] McNamara, T. P. 2005. Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition [M]. New York: Psychology Press.
[24] Meyer, D. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. 1971. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2): 227-234.
[25] Moss, H. E., Hare, M. L., Day, P. & Tyler, L. K. 1994. A distributed memory model of the associative boost in semantic priming [J]. Connection Science 6: 413-427.

[26] Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 1995. Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 21: 863-883.
[27] Neely, J. H. 1991. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories [J]. Basic Processes in Reading 11: 264-336.
[28] Perea, M. & Rosa, E. 2002. The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task [J]. Psychological Research 66: 180-194.
[29] Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A. & Carreiras, M. 2008. Masked associative/semantic priming effects across languages with highly proficient bilinguals [J]. Journal of Memory & Language 58 (4): 916-930.
[30] Plaut, D. C. & Booth, J. R. 2000. Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational for a Single-Mechanism account of lexical processing [J]. Psychological Review 107 (4): 786-823.
[31] Potter, M. C., So, K. F., Eckardt, B. V. & Feldman, L. B. 1984. Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 23 (1): 23-38.
[32] Quillian, M. R. 1967. Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities [J]. Behavioral Science 12: 410–430.
[33] Ratcliff, R. 1978. A theory of memory retrieval [J]. Psychological Review 85: 59–108.
[34] Ratcliff, R. & Mckoon, G. 1988. A retrieval theory of priming in memory [J]. Psychological Review 95: 385-408.
[35] Ratcliff, R. & McKoon, G. 1995. Sequential effects in lexical decision: Tests of compound cue retrieval theory [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21: 1380–1388.
[36] Reynvoet, B., Gevers, W. & Caessens, B. 2005. Unconscious primes activate motor codes through semantics [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition 31 (5): 991-1000.
[37] Seidenberg, M. S. & McClelland, J. L. 1989. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming [J]. Psychological Review 96: 523–568.
[38] Shelton, J. R. & Martin, R. C. 1992. How semantic is automatic semantic priming [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (6): 1192-1210.
[39] Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory [J]. Psychological Review 84: 127–190.
[40] Starreveld, P. A., Groot, A. M. B., Rossmark, B. M. M. & Hell, J. G. V. 2014. Parallel language activation during word processing in bilinguals: evidence from word production in sentence context [J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17 (2): 258-276.
[41] Williams, J. N. 1996. Is automatic priming semantic? [J] European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22: 139-151.
[42] Yun, G. 2016. Interspeaker variation in phonological and semantic priming effects on recognition of Korean and English words [J]. Korea Journal of English Language & Linguistics 16 (3): 563-597.
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.