Journal of Language, Linguistics and Literature
Articles Information
Journal of Language, Linguistics and Literature, Vol.4, No.4, Dec. 2018, Pub. Date: Oct. 25, 2018
Teaching Phonologically Motivated Lexical Chunks to Young EFL Learners
Pages: 55-63 Views: 70 Downloads: 41
Authors
[01] Pengyu Guo, School of Foreign Languages, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
[02] Sihong Huang, School of Foreign Languages, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Abstract
The importance of teaching motivated lexical chunks has been recognized by second language teachers and researchers and in various fields. However, it remained obscure on how to bring about the motivation of lexical chunks to the learners. In addition to the meaning-based semantic motivation, form-based phonological motivation has been proposed as an option, despite the lack of attention and empirical studies. The present study, taking alliteration as an example, aims to investigate the effect of teaching phonologically motivated lexical chunks to young EFL learners through awareness-raising tasks. The participants are second year junior high school students who are EFL learners and several EFL teachers in the same school. The data analysis yields three major findings: Firstly, alliterative lexical chunks have a stronger mnemonic effect than those that show little or no phonological repetition for Chinese junior high school students in four aspects: immediate recognition, delayed recognition, immediate reproduction and delayed reproduction. Secondly, most Chinese junior high school students failed to spontaneously notice alliteration in lexical chunks, which clearly suggests that even relatively salient patterns may need to be pointed out to help students to notice them. Thirdly, the mnemonic effect of alliteration can be maximized with teacher’s instruction to raise learners’ awareness and to notice it.
Keywords
Lexical Chunks, Alliteration, Phonological Motivation, Phonological Repetition, Noticing
References
[01] Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52(2), 323-363.
[02] Benson, M. (1989). The structure of the collocational dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography, 2, 1–14.
[03] Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21, 553–571.
[04] Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2005). Finding ways to make phrase-learning feasible: the mnemonic effect of alliteration. System, 33(2), 225-238.
[05] Boers, Frank, June Eyckmans, and Hélène Stengers. (2006) Means of motivating multiword units: rationale, mnemonic benefits and cognitive-style variables. In: Susan Foster-Cohen (ed.), Eurosla Yearbook 6, 169–190. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[06] Boers, F. and S. Lindstromberg. (2008) ‘Structural elaboration by the sound (and feel) of it’. In F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 330–53. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
[07] Boers, F., Stengers, H. (2008). Adding sound to the picture: an exercise in motivating the lexical composition of metaphorical idioms in English, Spanish and Dutch. In: Zanotto, M., Cameron, L., Cavalcanti, M. (Eds.), Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 63–78.
[08] Boers F, Lindstromberg S. (2009). Optimizing a Lexical Approach to Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
[09] Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2012). Are alliterative word combinations comparatively easy to remember for adult learners?.RELC Journal, 43(1), 127-135.
[10] Boers, F. and S. Lindstromberg, Eyckmans, J. (2014). Is alliteration mnemonic without awareness-raising? Language Awareness, 23(4), 291-303.
[11] Cook, G., (2000). Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[12] Clark, J., Paivio, A., (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 233–262.
[13] Craik, F. I. M., Lockhart, R. S.. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
[14] Ellis, N. C. (2006). Frequency effects in language acquisition: a review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–88.
[15] Gries, S. (2011). Phonological similarity in multi-word symbolic units. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(3), 491–510.
[16] Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
[17] Komuro Y (2009). Japanese learners’ collocation dictionary retrieval performance. In: Barfield A, Gyllstad H (eds) Researching Collocations in Another Language: Multiple Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 86-98.
[18] Kövecses, Z., & Szabo´, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17, 326–355.
[19] Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories tell us about the nature of thought. Women, fire, and dangerous things. University of Chicago Press.
[20] Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume 2: descriptive applications. Stanford: Standford University Press.
[21] Laufer B, Girsai N (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: a case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29(4): 694-716.
[22] Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008). The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks [J]. Applied Linguistics, 29(2), 200-222.
[23] Lewis, M. 1993. The lexical approach. Hove: Teacher Training Publications.
[24] Lewis, M. (2002). Implementing the lexical approach. Boston, MA: Thomson/Heinle.
[25] Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24, 223–242.
[26] Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
[27] Radden G., Panther K. U. (2004). Introduction: Reflections on motivation. Radden, G. and Panther, K.U. (eds). Studies in Linguistic Motivation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 1-46.
[28] Rubin, D. (1995). Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-out Rhymes [M]. London: Oxford University Press.
[29] Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (1–22). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
[30] Schmitt, N. (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. John Benjamins Pub.
[31] Smadja, F., & McKeown, K. (1991). Using collocations for language generation. Computational Intelligence, 7, 229–239.
[32] Wu S, Witten I, and Franken M (2010). Utilizing lexical data from a web-derived corpus to expand productive collocation knowledge. ReCALL, 22(1): 83-102.
[33] Barcroft, J. (2007). Effects of Opportunities for Word Retrieval during Second Language Vocabulary Learning. Language Learning, 57(1), 35-56.
[34] Nakata, T. (2017). Does repeated practice make perfect? The effects of within-session repeated retrieval on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 653-679.
[35] Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Gibson, E., Christophe, A., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2017). Words cluster phonetically beyond phonotactic regularities. Cognition, 128-145.
[36] Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning.. Cognition, 109(1), 54-65.
[37] De Carolis, L., Marsico, E., & Coupe, C. (2017). Evolutionary roots of sound symbolism: Association tasks of animal properties with phonetic features. Language & Communication, 21-35.
600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - 2017 American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.