[01] Iyorkaa Nater, Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Science, College of Agronomy, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria; Molecular Biology Laboratory, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria. [02] Omoigui Osabuohein Lucky, Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Science, College of Agronomy, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria; Molecular Biology Laboratory, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria; International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kano Station, Kano, Nigeria. [03] Odo Peter, Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Science, College of Agronomy, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria. [04] Kamara Alpha Yaya, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kano Station, Kano, Nigeria. [05] Ugbaa Macsamuel Sesugh, Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Science, College of Agronomy, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria; Molecular Biology Laboratory, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria; Center for Innovation in Procurement, Environmental and Social Standards (CIPESS), Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria. [06] Ekeruo Godspower Chibuike, Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Science, College of Agronomy, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria; Molecular Biology Laboratory, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria.

The study was conducted to compare two main sources of cowpea seed, Community Based Seed Producers (CBSP) and Licensed Seed Producers (LSP) for physical purity indices. From each seed source in every state, 15 seed samples of between 2 to 3 kg were collected for seed quality analysis. The collected seed samples were bulked according to variety, state, and seed source and then reduced to a working sample of four (4kg) using a modified halving method. The 4 kg was then divided into four equal parts as replicates. Seed purity was measured by sorting 1 kg of each working sample. The treatments were laid out in a completely Randomized Design (CRD) with four replications in the Molecular Biology Laboratory, Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi. The experiment was set up as a factorial combination on pure seeds, using 2 (seed source) × 3 (States) × 3 (varieties). Data were collected on the following parameters; Percentage Pure Seed, Percentage Inert Matter, Percentage Off-types seeds, Percentage Field Insect Damaged Seeds, Percentage Rain Damaged Seed, Percentage Weevil Damaged Seeds and Percentage Seeds Moisture Content and was analyzed was carried out using Minitab, version 2017. Seeds from the different states were statistically comparable. However, for varieties, cowpea seeds were not comparable except for rain damage and inert matter. On seed source, community-based seed producers performed below the licensed seed producers with respect to seeds damaged by rain, field insect damage, inert matter, weevil damage, pure seeds and moisture content. They were however, comparable in terms of off-types and mater. The two seed sources however, met the minimum standard required for cowpea seed certification by the National Agricultural Seed Council (NASC) with respect to off types and inert matter and hence could be used as an alternative seed source without any serious disadvantage of seeds purity. Therefore, we concluded that farmers can obtain seed from community-based seed producers without any serious disadvantage in terms of purity of seed lot.

Community Based Seed Producers, Licensed Seed Producers, Cowpea Seed Purity, Inert Matter, Off-type, Damaged Seeds, National Agricultural Seed Council

[01] Dugje, I. Y., Omoigui, L. O., Ekeleme, F., Kamara, A. Y., and Ajeigbe, H. (2009). Farmers’ guide to cowpea production in West Africa. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, 20: 12-14. [02] Ferguson, J. M., Keys, R. D., McLaughlin, F. W., and Warren, J. M. (1991). Seed and seed quality. AG-North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service, North Carolina State University (USA). [03] Matthews S, Noli E, Demir I, Khajeh-Hosseini M. and Wagner, M. H. (2012). Evaluation of seed quality: from physiology to international standardization. Seed Science Research, 22: 69-73. [04] Abdoulaye T, Sanogo D, Langyintuo A, Bamire SA, Olanrewaju A, (2009). Assessing the constraints affecting production and deployment of maize seed in DTMA countries of West Africa. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. [05] AATF-African Agricultural Technology Foundation / Network for Genetic Improvement of Cowpea in Africa (2006). Cowpea productivity technical standing committee; Nairobi Kenya. Page 26-29. [06] Omoigui L. O. and Kamara A. Y. (2016). Presentation at the Annual In-Country Review and Planning Meeting of Tropical Legumes III and USAID-Up scaling Project Held at IITA Kano Station, Conference Room, February, 2016. [07] International Seed Testing Association (ISTA, 2013). 30 ISTA Congress Seed Symposium, Antalya, Turkey 12-14 June (2013). [08] Matiki, A., Chikwambi, Z., Nyakanda, C. and Mashingaidz, A. B. (2012). An overview of the agronomic production constraints to black-eyed bean cowpea type (Vigna unguiculata (l.) Walp) for leaf and grain utilization in Zimbabwe. Science Journal of Crop Production, 1: 46-52. [09] Biemond, P. C., Stomph T. J., Kamara A., Abdoulage T., Hearne S. and Struik P. C. (2012). Are investments in informal seed systems for cowpeas a worthwhile endeavour? International Journal of Plant Production, 6 (3): 367-386. [10] Oluwafemi, A. R. (2012). Comparative effects of three plant powders and pirimiphos-methyl against the infestation of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in cowpea seeds. Journal of Entomology, 1: 87–99. [11] Egho, E. O. (2010). Studies on the control of major insect pests and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) under calendar and monitored application of synthetic chemical in ABRAKA, Southern Nigeria. Archives of Applied Science Research, 2 (4): 224-234. [12] Mary Wanjiku Njonjo (2018) Quality of Cowpea Seed Used By Farmers in Makueni and Taita Taveta Counties and Its Effect on Crop Performance. Msc. Thesis Nairobi [13] Biemond, P. C., Oguntade, O., Kumar, P. L., Stomph, T. J., Termorshuizen, A. J. and Struik, P. C. (2013). Does the informal seed system threaten cowpea seed health? Crop Protection Journal, 43: 166-174. [14] Bishaw, Z., Struik, P. C and Van Gastel, A. J. G. (2012). Farmers' seed sources and seed quality: physical and physiological quality. Journal of Crop Improvement, 26 (5): 655-692. [15] Ensermu, R., Mwangi, W., Verkuijl, H., Hassena M. and Alemayehu, Z. (1998). Farmers’wheat seed source and seed management in Chilalo auraja, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) p1-36. [16] Woldeselassie, Y. S. (1999). Evaluation of status and quality of barley seed used by the Northern and Central Ethiopian farmers. MSc thesis, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. [17] Rahman, M. H., Sattar, M. A., Salim, M. M. R., Quddus, M. A., & Ali, M. M. (2017). Study on Quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) Seed Collected from Different Sources and Locations of Bangladesh. American Journal of Plant Biology, 2 (4): 129-135. [18] Ochran Kipruto Mutai (2018) Effect of Seed Source and Post Harvest Handling Techniques on Seed Quality and Yield of Soybean. University of Nairobi. [19] Michael. P. J. Owen M. J. Powles, S. B. (2010). Herbicide resistant grain Sown in the western Australian grain belt. Weed sci. 58-472. [20] Bortey, H. M., Olympio, N. S., & Banful, B. (2011). Quality of farmer-saved tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mills.) seeds and its effect on fruit yield in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Horticulture, 9, 25-33. [21] Shaban, M. (2013). Review on physiological aspects of seed deterioration. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 6 (11): 627-631. [22] Hasan, B. M. A. (1995). A survey of wheat seed quality in Jordan. MSc thesis, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. [23] Greven, M. M., McKenzie, B. A., Hampton, J. G., Hill, M. J., Sedcole, J. R. and Hill, G. D. (2007). Factors affecting quality in dwarf French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) before harvest maturity. Seed Science and Technology, 32: 797-811. [24] Fujisaka, S., Moody, K., & Ingram, K. (1993). A descriptive study of farming practices for dry seeded rain fed lowland rice in India, Indonesia, and Myanmar. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 45 (1-2): 115-128. [25] Schaffer, V. A. and Vanderlip, R. L. (1999). The effect of conditioning on soybean seed quality. Journal of Production Agriculture, 12 (3): 455-459. [26] Ellis, R. H., Osei-Bonsu, K., & Roberts, E. H. (1982). The influence of genotype, temperature and moisture on seed longevity in chickpea, cowpea and soya bean. Annals of Botany, 50 (1): 69-82. [27] Jaetzold, R., Schmidt, H., Hornetz, B. and Shisanya, C. (2006). Farm management handbook of Kenya. Natural conditions and farm information, vol. II, Part C1 – East Kenya, 2nd edition. Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya.